Institutional
Editorial policy and medical review
Who produces and reviews Sono Ai Report public content, how AI is used in drafting and how corrections and updates work.
Editorial goal
The public content of Sono Ai Report exists to explain the product, its limits, its authorship, its sources, its security policy, and its role in the ultrasound reporting workflow. It should help doctors, clinics, search engines, and browsing agents understand what the platform does and, with the same clarity, what it does not do.
The content is not published to replace medical consultation, institutional guidelines, medical records, signed reports, or clinical decisions. Public pages about assistive AI must preserve the responsibility of the doctor who reviews, edits, and signs the final report.
Who produces and reviews
- Public authorship of the product and methodology is attributed to Dr. Pedro Henrique Sales Pontes, radiologist and sonographer.
- The institutional responsible is Ágarus Serviços e Soluções em Medicina LTDA, CNPJ 24.740.646/0001-73.
- Content about product operation, method, references, and clinical limits must be reviewed before being published as official information.
- Educational materials linked to the Ultrasound Academy may contextualize teaching and experience in ultrasound, but do not replace original guidelines.
Sources and traceability
Medical or methodological content should point to the methodology and sources page when relying on references, classifications, guidelines, educational materials, or internal rules for report organization. Statements without sufficient support should not be turned into a public promise.
- External sources should be cited as references, not copied as proprietary content.
- The public text should explain the scope of the reference and avoid suggesting universal automatic validation.
- When information may change, the canonical page should be used as the source of truth.
- Legal pages, security, privacy, terms, contact, and subprocessors must remain traceable without login.
Use of AI in public content
AI tools can assist with drafts, organization, or linguistic review, but official public content must be checked by a responsible human before publication. AI must not be used to invent sources, numbers, certifications, regulatory approvals, integrations, clinical outcomes, or capabilities that are not supported on the official pages.
- Do not publish claims of autonomous diagnosis.
- Do not claim to replace the doctor, RIS, PACS, medical records, or the clinic's internal policy.
- Do not use real patient data in public content.
- Do not promise certification, regulatory approval, or clinical outcomes without an official published source.
Corrections and updates
Factual errors, broken links, outdated commercial information, privacy issues, or sensitive clinical points should be corrected when identified. Relevant changes in public content should keep the page updated and, when it makes sense, point to the corresponding canonical source.
- General corrections can be sent to support@sonoaireport.com.
- Privacy and LGPD topics should go to privacy@sonoaireport.com.
- Security issues should go to security@sonoaireport.com.
- Billing questions should go to billing@sonoaireport.com.
Related canonical pages
Page updated on June 19, 2026. This policy describes publishing and review principles, and does not replace contracts, legal advice, original medical guidelines, or internal medical record policies.
Need to contact the Sono Ai Report team?
support@sonoaireport.comThis page summarizes operational practices in plain language. It does not replace legal advice, an agreement with your institution or internal medical-record policy.